Meet the innovative application that measures the credibility of your words.
In seconds, AmICredible catches what fact-checking alone misses, long before your name goes on any piece of content.
The best part is that AmICredible seamlessly integrates with how you work today.
of PR, Media and Communications Professionals cite misinformation as a top concern*
You will sleep better knowing that AmICredible is integrated into your review process.

Give your team a repeatable, defensible process for reviewing every piece of content, every time, so review quality doesn't change based on who reviewed it or how busy they are.
"We're careful" isn't a process you can pitch to a client. AmICredible gives you a documented credibility check you can put in front of a client or a prospect as proof that their reputation is protected.
Once a press release reaches a reporter, the mistake is public and the correction timeline is out of your hands. AmICredible helps you catch a sourcing gap or an outdated stat before it goes public.
Bylines, op-eds, and LinkedIn posts - you're building their reputation and they're trusting your judgment to do it right. AmICredible verifies the claims behind every piece of content, safeguarding the trust you're building on their behalf.
A statement can be technically true and still be a liability. A compelling statement can still be inaccurate. Truth and credibility aren't the same test, and most tools only check one of them.
AmICredible evaluates the full credibility framework behind what you publish because it’s within this framework that the real risk usually hides. We check for source quality, context, and how well a claim is actually supported, not just whether it's technically accurate.
Catch an error in review before it costs you a retraction, a client, or a career.
That is the power of a Credibility Layer.
Does the statement align with verified facts, scientific consensus, and available evidence? This is where most tools stop. AmICredible is just getting started.
Who made the statement? Does the source have a track record of reliability, or a documented history of bias and misinformation? Identity and provenance matter as much as the claim itself.
Is the statement clearly defined and specific, or is it vague, hyperbolic, and stripped of important meaning? Imprecision distorts meaning even when facts are present. We identify when a statement sacrifices clarity for persuasion.
Does the statement include the context needed to interpret it accurately, or does it oversimplify and misrepresent a more complex reality? A statement can be factually correct and still mislead. We flag the gap.